A good designer always tries to see things from the point of view of the user (or the customer, viewer, audience member, etc.). This is the ol' "It's not about you it's about them," a precept which is applicable to most aspects of business (or teaching, etc.). When we think about design, it's usually when we encounter poor design: an ambiguous sign, a confusing website, or text on an information board that is too small to read, and so on. This is why I always say to professionals aiming to become more design-mindful that they must learn to slow down and take note of the good and bad design that they encounter every day. Take a picture, write it down, keep a scrap book, pay attention. Lessons are everywhere (and free). Here's one that I noticed in my sports club the other day in Osaka that touches on the issue of putting yourself in the users' shoes and the general graphic design principle of contrast.
Clear labels
The picture below was taken with my iPhone and is a good representation of just how I saw the numbers (in lbs and kilos) printed in white on the stack of black plates on the lat-pull machine. The size and color of the sans serif type had enough contrast with the black background of weights to be read without difficulty. From even a small distance type can begin to appear fuzzy, but the sturdy sans serif typeface was perfectly clear. De-emphasizing the lbs. and kg unit marks also helped with clarity (yet, are the lbs. & kg marks really needed after the first row?).
Fuzzy labels
Below is part of a leg-press machine. This picture is a perfect representation of how I saw the numbers on the weights when I turned my heard to the left and looked down to adjust the weights. I could not read any of the numbers on the slabs of iron. Not a single one. The plates were of similar size to the previous machine, yet why was I unable to read any of the numbers (my vision is nearly perfect with lenses)? Let's bend down for a closer look.
(Below) When I leaned down as far as I could and stuck my face just a few centimeters from the stack, this is what I saw. With difficulty I could make out the top 5-6 rows only. Did the person who approved the labeling of the plates ever actually use the machine as intended? On an assembly line or on a computer screen the labels may have seemed legible, but what about the real world context? This is a very small thing, but it matters (it can be dangerous to attempt to lift a weight that is too heavy, for example).
There are
many ways to improve the legibility of the labels on this machine. First, you have to
ask if lbs. is even necessary. In Japan, like most parts of the world,
we use the metric system. Most of the users here will read the kg
number (yet it's in a subordinate position). If both measurement units
are necessary, then use greater spacing (for example) to separate the
numbers similar to the first example at the top of the page. Other
things that make the type harder to see include the smaller size, the
thick line, and the fact that the type is oblique. Having the unit marks the same size and weight does not help either. It all just blurs together.
Reverse type
Another reason for the poor legibility of the labels has to do with reverse type. Typically, reverse type is a light typeface on a dark background. For example, white on black, where the background element (such as a box) prints and the text is knocked out so that it doesn't print, letting the white paper show through. In the example above, because the background black "canvas" of the plates is the same color as the type on the white labels, it has a similar effect to reverse type. We see a lot of white, but we can not see the knocked out part or the emptiness which forms the shape of the numbers and letters clearly. In the example above, placing white type on the black plates would have made for far greater clarity.
Reverse type can be effective if used with restraint. Whether it's on a page or a slide or a poster, reverse type is going to stick out and attract the eye, which is why you use it sparingly. If you use loads of reverse type on a single design, it may just amount to a lot of noise. Below are a couple of slides. Notice how your eye was clearly drawn to that large black dot (in fact, it was likely the first thing you noticed when you scrolled down this page).









Good grief, I though that they were Kanji on the leg machine until I saw the second picture!
Posted by: L. | April 02, 2009 at 11:48 PM
"Notice how your eye was clearly drawn to that large black dot (in fact, it was likely the first thing you noticed when you scrolled down this page)."
Do you think the effect would be as strong if it were a square? I’ve been reading Grid Systems by Kimberly Elam, and she notes, "The human eyes loves the circle and embraces it."
Posted by: Zen Faulkes | April 03, 2009 at 12:59 AM
The colorful frog. A bit like the small character at the bottom of many cartoons in the International Herald Tribune: I usually read his comment before getting to "the bigger picture"
Posted by: Jan Schultink | April 03, 2009 at 04:00 AM
The metric number in the subordinate position? In a land where they read from right to left, do you really think so?
Posted by: Wondering | April 03, 2009 at 07:50 AM
Metric numbers are definitely in the subordinate position! Lbs are rounded to values that are even, memorble (if it is the right word) and perhaps meaningful - comparable to real life values. Kgs on the other hand are just a sorted bunch of random numbers with no real meaning at all.
There you go - this machine apparently came from US. "Ho ho, must be American-made".
pfs.
Posted by: Metric | April 03, 2009 at 08:51 PM
Can I use this frog in my own presentations ?
I just love it! hehehe
Posted by: courtnay | April 07, 2009 at 02:14 AM
Your entry reminded me about a brief TED speech of a guy who redesigns newspapers and boosts sales. His changes are not only about design, but also about keeping the customer in mind and structuring the content accordingly. His work is truly amazing!
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/jacek_utko_asks_can_design_save_the_newspaper.html
Posted by: Niels | April 07, 2009 at 07:50 PM
You always have to keep things in perspective of the consumer. So many times CEO's want what they think looks great, but don't realize how it will look for the end user.
Posted by: Free Sports Betting | April 08, 2009 at 10:24 AM
You spelled head wrong ...
"I turned my heard to the left"
Should be I turned my head to the left.
:-D
It happens to the best of us. Like you!
Posted by: Frank Jones | May 05, 2009 at 05:48 AM
Metric numbers are definitely in the subordinate position! Lbs are rounded to values that are even, memorble (if it is the right word) and perhaps meaningful - comparable to real life values. Kgs on the other hand are just a sorted bunch of random numbers with no real meaning at all.
There you go - this machine apparently came from US. "Ho ho, must be American-made".
Posted by: buy viagra | March 16, 2010 at 01:00 AM
Just watched it, and you're right, as are most of the commenters here. A great talk, well prepared, well delivered, and with an important set of messages. I'd buy one of his cars
Posted by: aion kinah | May 14, 2010 at 05:16 PM
[b][url=http://www.mbts-us.com/]MBT Shoes[/url][/b] is dedicated to the city life and live there.Wearing [b][url=http://www.mbts-us.com/]MBT[/url][/b] will provides you a new experience and makes your body more toned and healthier.Such [b][url=http://www.mbts-us.com/vibram-five-fingers-c-36.html]Vibram Five Fingers[/url][/b] are designed for men who always sit on the office.[b][url=http://www.mbts-us.com/]MBT Sandals[/url][/b] are a new choice of summer, hurry to buy a pair of, you deserve.Only provide more bending, how to use the weight distribution steps, so you could not shake, how to maintain the joints.
Posted by: June | June 05, 2010 at 04:46 PM