Kurt Vonnegut on why art matters for everyone.
November 09, 2013
"Practice any art, music, singing, dancing, acting, drawing, painting, sculpting, poetry, fiction, essays, reportage, no matter how well or badly, not to get money and fame, but to experience becoming, to find out what's inside you, to make your soul grow."You'll never get a job doing that!
— Kurt Vonnegut
Around the world, mass school systems still do not understand the role of art in developing a child's mind. Yes, they sometimes pay lip service to the importance of art education, and then art is the first thing to go when money is tight. Participating in the arts—learning to play an instrument or to express yourself through painting, writing, acting, etc.—are valuable not because they allow you to tick a box on a job application ten years in the future, the arts are valuable in and of themselves. What is a life without art in it? What is a school worth without a deep commitment to the whole mind (and body) of the student, which includes art. "You'll never get a job doing that" is something I actually heard in high school when I spent so much energy on music. Later I heard the same thing from business or engineering students when I was getting a degree in Philosophy from OSU. Looking back, I do not regret spending so much energy on music, my only regret is that I did not spend *more* energy exploring other disciplines in the arts. I think I would be a much better public speaker today, for example, if I would have studied drama and put myself up on a stage acting in front of a large audience, one of the scariest things one can do.
"You were probably steered benignly away from things at school when you were a kid, things you liked, on the grounds that you would never get a job doing that. Is that right? Don't do music, you're not going to be a musician; don't do art, you won't be an artist. Benign advice—now, profoundly mistaken."
— Sir Ken Robinson
The role of art & music in education
The advice from Kurt Vonnegut ties in nicely with a piece that came out a couple of years ago by Quincy Jones called Arts Education in America. Quincy asks "...can we really run the risk of becoming a culturally bankrupt nation
because we have not inserted a curriculum into our educational
institutions that will teach and nurture creativity in our children?" The most interesting part of Quincy's article were the words taken from the 1943 War Department Education Manual EM 603 that got its recommendations on jazz completely wrong. (Read it
— you'll be amazed.) Kind of makes you wonder what else — in spite of
good intentions — our educational institutions and leaders are getting
completely wrong today? If our recommendations are based on the
assumptions that science is not a place for creative thinking or that
the arts/humanities have no room for analysis and logic or that students
need to make a choice about what kind of person they
are — logical or intuitive — then something tells me we're getting it
wrong. We need both science and the arts...and we need to do better
teaching both.
"It has been proven time and time again in countless studies that students who actively participate in arts education are twice as likely to read for pleasure, have strengthened problem-solving and critical thinking skills, are four times more likely to be recognized for academic achievement, four times more likely to participate in a math and science fair...."
— Quincy Jones
Above: Slide with famous Picasso quote featuring a photo of my son banging on the drums before he was old enough to walk.
Related
• Bill Strickland makes change with a slide show
• Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity
H/T Letters of Note website.
I agree wholeheartedly with this article. When I read such encouraging and positive recommendations for education I get very excited thinking that good things are happening in schools. If only it could be more widespread and not left to a few enlightened innovative and creative teachers. I think the following statement from your article is very important: "If our recommendations are based on the assumptions that science is not a place for creative thinking or that the arts/humanities have no room for analysis and logic or that students need to make a choice about what kind of person they are — logical or intuitive — then something tells me we're getting it wrong. We need both science and the arts...and we need to do better teaching both." Well done! Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Norah | November 09, 2013 at 06:07 PM
Great Article ... Too often we look at the dollars and cents side of everything and forget about the real value of the arts in our lives. Eventually, we will reap what we sow and will be stuck listen to unoriginal music, shows and movies based on real life, and a world devoid of imagination and creativity ... Or we might already be there.
Posted by: DennisDill | November 10, 2013 at 12:34 AM
This is a lovely article on a vital topic. As an actor and speech coach, I agree wholeheartedly with your advice about taking an acting class to be better at public speaking. I often say that every school--middle school, high college, college, graduate school, and professional programs--should require that everyone take an acting class. It's a great way to stretch ourselves, break through our self-imposed walls, and teach us that we can make a fool of ourselves in front of others without the world ending. Thank you for making the suggestion!
Posted by: Gary Genard | November 12, 2013 at 12:15 AM
It is well known how the arts heal and moves one forward. If the schools do not provide the arts, the parents must. In fact, the parents must provide the arts to start with...
Posted by: Debbra W | November 13, 2013 at 07:41 AM